Skip to main content

The Weight of Responsibility: A Developer’s Journey to Balance Passion and Reality

Photo by Luis Villasmil on Unsplash





For the past several years, Eddie has been on a steady climb in his career as a developer, but recently, he found himself at a crossroads — caught between the weight of his responsibilities and the desire to pursue his true passions.

His journey began with a three-month internship as a web developer, which led to nearly four years in an application developer role. After that, he spent almost a year as a systems associate, managing tasks across systems analysis, quality assurance, and business analysis. Eventually, he returned to full-time software development for another two years before transitioning into more complex roles. For over a year, he worked as a multi-role software developer and database administrator before stepping into his current position as a senior software developer, database administrator, and cloud administrator — occasionally handling security tasks as well. Now, with over 8 years of professional experience, he also leads a small team of developers, which has been one of the most rewarding aspects of his career.

Despite all these achievements, Eddie is starting to feel burnt out. He loves developing APIs — it’s something he could do forever — but lately, it feels more like a hobby he’d rather enjoy on the side than the centerpiece of his professional life.

He feels pressured by the expectations to keep pushing, work harder, or seek higher-paying opportunities abroad. Eddie envies those who can simply resign, take a break, and still get by. For him, even the thought of resting feels impossible — there’s always something that needs to be done. Some weekends, he does nothing but stay in bed, watch movies, or play games, only to have Monday arrive and the cycle repeat.

Switching jobs isn’t easy for him either. The transition period might leave him unable to get by, and he doesn’t want to depend on support during that time. It’s a risk he’s not in a position to take, even though he knows a change might bring some relief.

Amidst all this pressure, he found solace in something unexpected: writing. Eddie started creating articles and guides, and for the first time in a long while, he felt genuinely excited about something. Technical writing seemed like the perfect career shift — blending his love for tech with his newfound passion for writing. He began seriously considering a career change.

But reality hit hard. Technical writing, while fulfilling, wouldn’t offer the financial stability he needs. He can’t afford to make that leap, no matter how much he wants to. His responsibilities still outweigh his personal desires.

At the same time, he doesn’t blame anyone for the situation he’s in. He’s not wishing that he had been born into a different life. In fact, he’s thankful for the opportunities he’s had, knowing he’s done the best he can. It’s just that the weight of these responsibilities, combined with his personal goals, can feel overwhelming at times.

So, where does that leave Eddie?

For now, he’s staying in his current role, continuing to do what he’s good at, while also finding ways to balance his love for writing on the side. Even though he can’t switch careers, he can still pursue what he loves. Maybe that’s the lesson he needed to learn — you don’t always need a drastic change to find happiness. Sometimes, it’s about finding small ways to incorporate your passions into your life.

To those who feel similarly — those burdened by responsibility but still craving fulfillment — remember that you don’t have to give up on what you love. It’s about finding a balance, even if the steps are small. You can still pursue your passions while fulfilling the roles that life demands of you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Selenium for Beginners: What, Where, When, and Why to Use It in Automated Testing

In today’s software development landscape, automated testing has become essential for delivering robust applications efficiently. Among various automated testing tools,   Selenium   stands out as one of the most widely used and beginner-friendly options. As you embark on your journey into automated testing, it’s crucial to understand the   what, where, when, and why   of using Selenium. In this guide we will run through these essentials and help you decide if Selenium is the right tool for you. What is Selenium? Selenium  is an open-source framework used primarily for automating web browsers. It enables developers and testers to write scripts that interact with websites, simulating actions like clicking buttons, filling out forms, and navigating pages, which allows for comprehensive automated testing. Selenium supports multiple programming languages, including Python, Java, C#, and JavaScript, making it flexible for teams with different coding preferences. Key Components of Selenium: S

ORM vs Non-ORM: Choosing the Right Approach for Your Database Queries

As developers, we often face decisions that affect how we interact with databases in our applications. One critical choice is whether to use an ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) tool or stick with traditional non-ORM methods like writing raw SQL queries or using query builders. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages, and the decision depends on several factors, such as the complexity of the queries, project requirements, and the design of the database itself. In this guide, we’ll explore the key differences between ORM and non-ORM approaches, discuss when to use each, and highlight the pros and cons to help you make the right decision for your next project. What is an ORM? An ORM is a tool or library that allows developers to interact with a relational database using an object-oriented paradigm. It maps database tables to classes, rows to objects, and columns to attributes, allowing developers to work with data using their programming language’s syntax rather than writing SQL

Avoiding Confusion in API Design: The Importance of Clear Responses

In today’s fast-paced software development landscape, APIs play a crucial role in connecting services and enabling functionality. However, poor design choices can lead to confusion and inefficiency for both developers and users. One such choice is the omission of a response body for successful requests, a practice I recently encountered in an enterprise API designed for bill payments. The Case of the No-Response API The API in question serves two main endpoints: one for inquiring about account validity and another for confirming payment. When successful, the API returned a  200 OK  status but no response body. This design choice led to significant confusion during our integration process. Even the internal team who developed the said API struggled to justify this approach, revealing a lack of clarity around the rationale behind it. Pros of This Design Choice While the intention behind this design may have been to streamline responses, several potential benefits can be identified: Reduc

The Hidden Costs of Overdesign and Bad Practices in API Systems

In software development, simplicity and clarity are often sacrificed in favor of overly complex solutions. While it can be tempting to add more features and intricate designs to ensure robustness, overdesign and poor practices can have significant consequences. They frustrate developers, lead to inefficiencies, increase costs, and put unnecessary strain on system resources.  A recent example involving a team that has faced challenges with complexity highlights the pitfalls of such an approach. Overdesign: The Problem of Too Much Complexity Overdesign occurs when systems are built with more complexity than necessary. This might manifest in bloated APIs, convoluted data flows, or excessive checks and processes that don’t add substantial value. The goal is often to anticipate future problems, but this approach typically results in cumbersome systems that are difficult to maintain and scale. In one case, a company found itself paying a hefty price just to host two API services and a portal